Indicators on bail granted to pregnant woman in 302 case laws You Should Know
Indicators on bail granted to pregnant woman in 302 case laws You Should Know
Blog Article
case regulation Case legislation is law that is based on judicial decisions rather than law based on constitutions , statutes , or regulations . Case regulation concerns one of a kind disputes resolved by courts using the concrete facts of the case. By contrast, statutes and regulations are written abstractly. Case legislation, also used interchangeably with common law , refers back to the collection of precedents and authority set by previous judicial decisions over a particular issue or topic.
Some pluralist systems, like Scots law in Scotland and types of civil legislation jurisdictions in Quebec and Louisiana, never specifically fit into the dual common-civil regulation system classifications. These types of systems may well have been seriously influenced through the Anglo-American common regulation tradition; however, their substantive legislation is firmly rooted while in the civil law tradition.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the figured out counsel to the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues in the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) of your Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession on the subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to generally be decided via the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this element for interim custody of the topic premises In case the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
The ruling on the first court created case regulation that must be followed by other courts till or Except if possibly new legislation is created, or simply a higher court rules differently.
184 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the instant case, the guidelines as established forth would not utilize, because the criminal Court has not convicted the petitioner, fairly he has actually been acquitted of the criminal charges based on evidence and it's effectively-settled legislation that once the civil servant is acquitted from the criminal case, then on this pretty charge he cannot be awarded in almost any punishment by the department and held him disqualified for your post because acquittal for all potential purposes. The aforesaid proposition has become set at naught through the Supreme Court of Pakistan while in the case on the District Police Officer Mainwali and a pair of others v.
Lots of the volumes (together with more recent volumes than the library's holdings) are also available online through the Caselaw Access Project.
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a 12-year previous boy from his home to protect him from the horrible physical and sexual abuse he experienced suffered in his home, and also to prevent him from abusing other children from the home. The boy was placed in an crisis foster home, and was later shifted all around within the foster care system.
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the law when it is unclear how it applies to any given situation, frequently rendering judgments based around the intent of lawmakers and the circumstances of your case at hand. This kind of decisions become a guide for long run similar cases.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming on the main case, Additionally it is a nicely-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is issue into the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.
This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the summary or finding reached by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the summary or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may perhaps interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mildew the relief to make it appropriate towards the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority may be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified with the decision of your Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions are classified as the opinions that are filed around the day that the appellate court issues its decision and are often not the court's final opinion.
In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe like a foster child. Although the pair experienced two younger children of their own at home, the social worker didn't explain to them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report to your court the following day, the worker reported the boy’s placement inside the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the couple had youthful children.
156 . Const. P. 1015/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem Jehangir V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is also important to note that neither seniority nor promotion would be the vested right of a civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion may very check here well be claimed or granted without the actual length of service on account of vested rights. The purpose of prescribing a particular duration of service for getting to be entitled to get regarded as for promotion to a higher quality, of course, will not be without logic because the officer that is at first inducted to a particular post needs to provide about the stated post to gain experience to hold the next higher post and to provide the public in the befitting method.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, It is additionally a nicely-recognized proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is topic to your procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.